Nima Abdullahzadeh games IP protection methods: The blocking of movie download sites , the anger of the users of these sites , filing a complaint with Netflix, and finally Netflix’s unexpected and controversial response to the Iranian platform “Namava” was a chain of events that confronts Iranian platforms and their users with a serious question: if the real owners of the content And if the copyright holders want to react to what is happening in Iran, what options do they have in front of them? In this article, in a conversation with Nima Abdullahzadeh, legal expert familiar with international copyright cases, we answer this important question. Discover even more info at نیما عبدالله زاده.
Nima Abdullahzadeh says in response: In this case, the work of the content owners becomes difficult, because first they have to see the content and collect documents. As long as they do not have someone in Iran, they cannot do such a thing. But it should be noted that foreign platforms cooperate with many law firms and it is not difficult to find an Iranian lawyer in these law firms to receive advice and find relationships in Iran to collect documents. This is the reason why many such platforms serve only with Iran’s IP and have made it impossible to access the content from outside. But can this issue be an obstacle to the possible events described?
Nima Abdullahzadeh also pointed out the importance of the appropriate use of the work and said that if the buyer misuses your work and distributes it in an inappropriate place and insults the creator, the creator will be able to file a complaint. The business development consultant of the National Foundation of Computer Games added that the material right has a wider range and the creator of the work can monitor the publication of his work. Abdullahzadeh went on to discuss the issue of copyright in Iran, referring to the broadness of the laws defined in 1348 and 1369, and said that the broad and broad definition of this law made the game to be included in this law. But a very important point regarding Iran’s copyright law is related to the way the work is presented.
Nima Abdullahzadeh says: “Purchasing content from domestic companies is not logical. For example, as an Iranian company, you obtain an exclusive license to display content. But since Iranian law basically does not support that content, you cannot prohibit your competitor’s service provider who has not paid for the content from displaying the same content. As a result, from a commercial point of view, buying content weakens the Iranian company. Because the competitor can display it without paying.”
Abdullahzadeh further pointed to the differences between the copyright law in Iran and the United States and said that in Iran, the law deals with the violator who knowingly violates IP in a criminal manner and with a prison sentence. The copyright law in Iran is defined 30 years after the death of the last author and creator, and this right can be inherited. American law says that if an American work is used, it must be registered in a special system in order to use copyright laws. In Iran, the producer does not need to register a copyright and the works receive this right from the time of publication.
Nima Abdullahzadeh: The industry is formed with income, and if there is no intellectual property, they are practically not a game industry either. At the beginning, I personally expected that this speech would be well received, considering the importance of the copyright issue in Iran and the world and the connection of this issue with the publishing of games in the world markets, but the reception cannot be considered acceptable.
